January - February 1999 - ChipScale Review

January - February 1999


eMail the Editor

HDI Substrates Enable Future Electronics

When will the American Organic Substrate (Printed Circuit Board) Industry climb aboard the Microvia/Build-up Train?

By Harvey S. Miller, Contributing Editor

Conventional PC boards do not permit enough wiring density to route next-generation equipment servers, workstations or base stations, such as with their increased population of integrated circuits in chip-scale packages and ball grid arrays. The wiring density of conventional PC boards is limited by the following factors:

  1. Subtractive etching below 100 mic-rons (4 mils) leads to extreme yield reductions.
  2. Mechanically drilled through-holes become increasingly expensive below 250 microns (10 mils).
  3. Through-holes of any size reduce the wiring-available area on all layers, and the dogleg needed to distance them from the component mounting pads (to prevent solder wicking) also reduces top-layer wiring area.

Substrate Combinations

HDI substrates, applied in many different feature combinations, overcome these challenges. Common elements include:

  1. Additive technology over a deposited resin surface. High precision permanent resists enable 50 micron and below lines and spaces.
  2. Blind microvias (in-pad), 50 microns and less, are the key wiring-density enhancement which differentiates HDI substrates from conventional PC boards.
  3. Other HDI technologies are outlined in Table 2 and described from the Japanese experience, below.

Japanese Dominate

Today Japanese companies dominate the new high-density interconnect technologies. Table 1 represents a much-endorsed view of the present and near future. The only question is whether the U.S. will lag behind even Europe as it enters the 21st century. The irony is that most of the elements of the new technologies were developed here.

Table 1: World Microvia Board Production
($ Millions)
(NT Information Ltd.)
Region 1997 E 1998 F 1999 F 2000 F 2001 F
Japan
U.S.
Europe
Asia
Total $M
600
30
7
10
647
1000
35
15
50
1100
1700
50
70
120
1940
2300
100
200
200
2800
3000
200
400
400
4000

But the Japanese companies have been putting it all together since 1994, transforming "PC boards" into "organic HDI substrates." How they are doing it is best illustrated with a case-by-case analysis of the major Japanese company approaches. A discussion of differences with the U.S. position will address the "why" of the lag and provide the basis for a perspective. Finally, we will offer suggestions to the North American companies.

Five major Japanese company papers delivered at the IMAPS '98 conference in San Diego, November 3-5, illuminated their HDI substrate constructions directed both to IC packages and to the boards that mount and interconnect them. Table 2 describes the elements of each.

Table 2: Profiles of Five Japanese Companies, Build-up Technologies

Via Formulation
Circuit Formulation

Photo Laser Layer Construction Additive Subtractive Via Metalization
Hitachi Hitavia 3
X MCF-6000E Cu-Clad 5u
epoxy fiber-filled laminate

X e'less+e'lytic
Ibiden IBSS X
coated IPNM
expoxy resin
X
polymer con-
ductive paste
Japan Victor VIL
X 2-layer epoxy resin X
polymer con-
ductive paste
Matsushita ALIVH
X Cu-Clad epoxy-aramid
fiber laminate

X e'less+e'lytic
NECuV1
X coated resin X
additive plating


Summary Comments on Table 2:

  • Hole formation laser "wins" 4 to 1, Pulsed and CW. (Fujitsu, not included in our five, is moving from photo to laser via in its FLLD construction.)
  • Build-up layer is coated or deposited in two examples, discrete laminate or film in three. (Fujitsu will even the score.)
  • Circuit formation is additive in three, enabling 50 (and lower)-micron lines and spaces, subtractive in two.
  • Via metalization uses conductive paste in three, plating in two.
Each of the companies is in volume production of HDI substrates for either IC packages or boards, typically both.

Why the 4+ - year Japanese lead in Microvias and HDIs? The interrelated reasons are organization, financial culture and market driven.

Figure 1. This board, manufactured for a portable application, represents an interim design. Note the blind microvias (in-pad) and alongside the dogbone vias. (Courtesy HADCO)

  1. In line with the pattern of Japanese industry, four of the five companies in our example are vertically integrated from manufacturing (including PC board substrate fabrication) to product marketing. This pattern is rare in North America, where the industry is almost entirely merchant. But this factor is not as critical as the next.
  2. In Japan, corporate partnerships are honored, and there is no need to make Wall Street's next quarterly report expectations. That makes long-term investment easier to implement.
  3. Finally, the small, digital-consumer products of the Japanese companies required HDI by 1995. American products, with larger boards in non-portable applications, are just beginning to require HDI for routing.
We win the world prize for standards meetings, new technology symposia and otherwise creating paper.

The U.S. is also great at innovations that are misdirected or not fully developed, resulting in no financial benefit. (These observations apply with special force to the manufacturing infrastructure. In silicon and software we are the greatest.) Examples relevant to HDI follow:

Additive technology was developed and refined by Kollmorgen for 30 years. Although simple and elegant, it was never able to attain lower cost than subtractive.

Demands on the permanent resist to withstand highly acid and alkaline solutions contributed to that cost differential. So subtractive, with its lower resolution capabilities, became mainstream, with all the benefits of volume-driven, lower-cost materials. In 1994, AMP pulled the plug on the last U.S. additive facility after trying to sell product to automotive applications.

Figure 2 Closeup of a laser-drilled microvia: A CO2 laser was employed to sublimate epoxy and glass with a bounce pad. (Courtesy HADCO)

That was when the Japanese companies were beginning to use additive in an entirely different, much-higher- potential context, as an element of HDI. The embittered veterans of the "Additive Wars" should be sought out for their value to serious American HDI fabricators.

Laser buried vias were used by Don Seraphim to increase connectivity in IBM's 3081 System in 1981. The program lasted two years.

As 1999 begins, many U.S.-based PC board fabricators are acquiring laser drills. Using materials technology similar to Hitavia 3 (Table 2), but with resin-coated copper (RCC), they are beginning to fabricate HDI substrates. Hadco uses a YAG IR laser to ablate the copper, then a CO2 UV laser to remove dielectric down to the next copper surface— a common technique.

Three companies are using photo-via techniques (similar to Ibiden): Dii Multek in Austin for the IBM ThinkPad notebook, IBM Endicott (NY) and MicroVia in Florida.

Ambitious Plans

Two divisions of billion dollar companies have made public very ambitious, dedicated HDI substrate plans backed by very large capital investments.

  1. Johnson Matthey ACI intends to be the largest North American supplier. By the end of 1999 it will have 10 laser drills„four YAG to ablate copper (for RCC processing) and six CO2 units to remove dielectric. It has a history of successful photovia prototyping that will help, and a cross-license with Kyocera for build-up technology.
  2. AlliedSignal's ASTI has three captive materials available for HDI building blocks: a) resin-coated copper; b) Ultrastable, a premium thin copper clad, thin rigid material, both from the laminate sister division; and c) two-metal-layer polyimide film.
Package substrates are the main objective, but as with JM, these enable the board substrates that have somewhat lower density requirements.

Low-profile efforts are under way by many other American fabricators. The HDI substrate industry is very young and has a long way to grow. American, European and other Asian companies will add innovative contributions to those of Japanese companies.

Suggestions to U.S. PC board companies for making the transition to HDI substrate fabrication

  1. Seek strategic partnerships with equipment and materials companies wherever possible. Hard bargaining over the last 5% of price can be counter productive if it means losing a valuable supplier-partner.
  2. Seek support from OEM customers who need HDI. Some of these are the companies that once cast off fabrication as a non-core competency. They must be wondering now whether HDI substrate fabrication is truly a non-core competency.
  3. Consider licenses such as those offered by Matsushita for ALIVH or Dyconex for plasma.
Harvey Miller says he has been digging into electronic packaging markets for more than 25 years, soon after he received an economics degree from the University of Michigan. Drafted in World War II, he spent most of the war years studying electrical engineering. He then worked as a components evaluation engineer at several electronics OEMs, all of which have disappeared. He claims to have found his true calling at Quantum Science Corp. (defunct), where he was involved in constructing a massive input/output model of the electronics industry. By the time it was finished, "A new and different electronics industry had evolved," he recalls. The experience, however, helped him to construct other databases, such as FABFILE. He is president of Kirk-Miller Associates, Palo Alto, Calif., and may be reached at 650.327.2029, fax 650.327.2360.


Chip Scale Review o 7291 Coronado Drive, Suite 8 o San Jose, CA 95129 o Email: editor@chipscalereview.com



Feature, 99/03/29, 05/13/99, ID=9901/featured1
Keywords=af00

© 1998 ChipScale REVIEW