| Are Chip-Scale Packages
and Known-Good Die Competitors or Teammates? |
| "KGD
test may include high and low temperature function testing (at
speed) and sometimes wafer-level burn-in." |
By
Jerry Secrest
Secrest Research
Do CSPs compete with known-good die, or does
one complement the other? You could assume that they are competitors,
but it is the application that determines whether known-good die
(KGD) or chip-scale packaging is employed.
KGD is the right choice for the highest density
and performance. In applications where low cost, moderate density
and §exibility are required, however, CSPs are the choice, but both
are needed now.
Status
Report
CSPs are generally deÞned as a package about
1.2X the dimension (1.5X the area) of the die. Within this definition,
CSPs have many variations.
However, a trend among manufacturers is the
move towards wafer-level or frame processing, which allows several
to many die to be processed into CSP packages in an array. The CSP
is then tested in the array format and singulated. Both methods
support reduced manufacturing costs.
KGD has been around for almost a decade, but
KGD testing and processing is still evolving. The concept is that
KGD will have the same electrical specifications, quality and reliability
as die in packages. KGD are in bare die form for use with wire bonds
and with ball grid arrays, or C4 arrays for §ip-chip attachment.
In the last few years, KGD suppliers have been
pressured to upgrade the testing to make higher quality KGD. This
pressure is being applied by manufacturers of mobile, low-cost products,
such as cell phones and personal digital assistants.
CSPs have incomplete standards to cover their
manufacture and resulting "package." Manufacturers have their own
variations in packaging, manufacturing methods and testing, because
a significant proportion of CSP manufacturing is for internal consumption.
An issue with KGD is the package outline, since
a change to the die is also a change to the package. If a semiconductor
company performs a die shrink, package outline changes cause handling
requirements to change.
If the die employs wire bonds connected to the
leads on a substrate, a die shrink will need a different bonding
program. A shrunken KGD with BGA connections may or may not cause
the BGA to change.
Meeting
Spec
Another KGD issue is how to assure that the
IC meets electrical speciÞcations and reliability requirements when
testing is done in die form on a wafer.
Part of this issue can be addressed by wafer
testing at both low and high temperatures. High temperature testing
is needed because CMOS performance declines as temperature rises.
This testing can be cost effective because wafer probers rapidly
index die to the test head.
Stress testing is performed at wafer test to
accelerate the failure of a die that may fail in early field life.
Some semiconductor companies are using wafer-level burn-in to remove
early life fails. Still another technique employs data modeling
to predict failure-prone die.
Teammates
Let's consider for a moment a stacked CSP (SCSP),
which is a multi-chip module disguised as a CSP.
Packaging for SCSPs begins by stacking two or
three die on top of a BGA substrate with an insulating strip between
them. Leads are bonded to the substrate, and molding around the
stack completes the device.
Since a SCSP is a package that may even be smaller
than the enclosed die area, our deÞnition of a CSP no longer holds.
An SCSP example is paired Flash memory and RAM. Another SCSP is
memory to support logic. These stacked packages are so thin (1.4
mm), that wafers must be thinned to 150-200 microns prior to wafer
saw for die separation and placement. Special die sockets are needed
if test or burn-in is performed after wafer saw.
Test
Yields
Achieving high SCSP test yields requires internal
KGD with matched speed performance, i.e. the same speed grade. If
the die speed grades do not match, the enclosed chip combination
will be unuseable.
Speed testing is typically done on product after
packaging,but SCSP needs are pushing product speed testing back
to wafer test.
An additional issue is the diagnostics of SCSP
test failures. Diagnostics are made difÞcult because there are fewer
connections to the package with SCSPs than if the enclosed die were
in separate packages. A solution to this problem may be to modify
the design of the circuits on the die to allow for diagnostics.
E-Test
KGD test may include high and low temperature
function testing (at speed) and sometimes wafer-level burn-in. An
alternate to speed testing is the use of E-test to bin wafers by
speed grade. The KGD test moves complete product testing in front
of packaging. Die exiting from KGD test can go into either MCMs
or SCSPs and then be tested for the packaged function. (Alternatively,
this die may be used in single-die packages, requiring only a test
for opens/shorts to ensure a viable packaging interconnect.)
The bin data from E-test (and or KGD test) is
transferred to the die-attach location to selected wafers (and/or
die) to match the required speed grade. Wafers not suitable for
KGD §ow can be screened out at E-test and routed to conventional
packaging that includes full testing plus burn-in.
Near-Term
Impact
Because the industry needs die tested to KGD
criteria for high SCSP test yields, KGD and CSP are teammates in
providing a cost-effective solution for the OEM.
Once semiconductor companies accept KGD testing
to meet MCM and CSP needs, they may start to test all product by
this method to reduce after-packaging test time and costs.
 |
Mr.
Secrest is the principal consultant at Secrest Research, providing
technical consulting to improve semiconductor manufacturing
and products. He can be reached at secrest@ix.netcom.com. |
|