| Meet the New Kid on the
Flip-Chip Lithography Block |
By Doug Anberg,
Ultratech Stepper Inc., S
|
From
Contact Printers to Steppers:
Formerly,
most flip-chip lithography processing, known as bump-bond
formation, was performed with contact aligners. These aligners,
however, have become yield-limiting, prompting users to apply
traditional front-end lithography equipment to this packaging
application by shifting to the use of wafer steppers.
|
In the last two years, the market for flip-chip
applications has experienced tremendous growth -a trend that is
changing the landscape of the packaging industry.
Fueled by the continued proliferation of smaller,
higher-performing, high-speed digital devices-such as cellular phones,
pagers, watches and sophisticated high-density smart cards, the
accelerated boom in flip-chip packaging is unlikely to abate in
the near term (Figure 1).
 |
Figure
1.
Collage
of products utilizing bump processing (Casio Computer)
|
According to a recent study by TechSearch International
(Austin, Texas), the flip-chip market will grow from 490 million
units in 1997 to 2.4 billion units in 2004, an explosive 400 percent
increase over seven years (Figure 2). While these growth predictions
present a new market opportunity for chip makers and equipment suppliers
alike, there are critical manufacturing challenges emerging that
must be addressed.
 |
Figure
2.
Projected
Flip-Chip Market Growth The flip-chip market is expected to
grow from 490 million units in 1997 to 2.4 billion units in
2004, an explosive 400 percent over seven years. |
Of primary concern to foundries and packaging
facilities is the availability of high-yield, highly reliable, flexible
and cost-effective equipment to accommodate their extremely varied
flip-chip bump-bond processing needs.
Existing bump foundries that are not utilizing
stepper technology are being forced to decide whether their contact
printers are sufficient for volume bumping, or if a stepper must
be purchased.
Packaging foundries that want to add bump processing
to their services must decide whether to buy contact aligners or
steppers for their lithography requirements. New tools are needed
that can perform to the higher standards demanded by high-density
packaging.
Contact
Aligners
In the past, most flip-chip lithography processing,
known as bump-bond formation, has been performed with contact aligners,
whether operated in a contact or proximity mode.
With flip-chip now the preferred packaging method
for both high-speed digital and multi-chip module (MCM) applications,
the need for flip-chip bump processing has increased, and packaging
facilities are demanding more automated, flexible and highly reliable
lithography tools capable of producing lower defect rates for the
bump-bond process.
The need to reduce solder ball pitch also continues.
Currently averaging around 1 mm, in the future, BGA solder ball
pitch will drop to 0.5 mm for high-performance applications. Chip-scale
packaging, meanwhile, will require a pitch of 0.30 mm. The 1999
SIA International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors predicts
that 0.30 mm solder ball pitch will not be required until the 50
nm technology node, which is expected to be in place in 2011.
Internet
Requirements
The small size and weight requirements of new
handheld portable Internet access devices, however, are driving
packaging densities at an accelerated rate. If this trend continues,
packaging density and solder ball pitch are likely to exceed the
SIA Roadmap's expectations, and 0.30 mm pitches may be needed as
early as 2005.
As bump packaging enters mainstream usage, prices
for this service have become extremely competitive. Consequently,
foundries and packaging facilities are pressed to squeeze even higher
yields out of their bump operations.
Indeed, as pad dimensions shrink and redistribution-level
processing becomes the norm, any printed defects limit line yield,
and a zero yield impact from the lithography step is therefore required.
Contact aligners, however, may be unable to
produce high yields, especially below the level of 0.5 mm solder
ball pitches. They are limited, in particular, by contamination
issues. This contact aligner limitation is true largely because
their exposure method is not based on optics.
Instead, their exposure mechanism consists of
a light source plus a shadow mask, limiting their resolution when
operated in proximity mode. This becomes an even greater problem
when processing 200 mm wafers, due to warpage that causes non-uniform
gaps between the wafer and the mask.
Additionally, contact aligners are simply too
slow to keep up with the high-volume needs of flip-chip processing
on very thick resist films, which can require exposures in excess
of 1 Joule/cm2. Finally, the time required for wafer size conversion
can significantly impact overall productivity. Contact aligners
have, in effect, become yield-limiting steps in the process, at
the same time that the high-density chips that are candidates for
flip-chip processing require even higher overall production yields
to keep prices of final packaged devices competitive.
Wafer
Steppers
Chip makers have therefore begun to apply traditional
front-end lithography equipment to this back-end packaging application
by shifting to the use of wafer steppers for bump lithography. Compared
to contact aligners, steppers have been able to significantly reduce
wafer defect density.
This reduction is possible because steppers
use 100 percent defect-free reticles with pellicle protection; their
projection optics provide defect-free, non-contact imaging and their
precision stage technology ensures superior alignment (Figure 3).
Thus, steppers contribute zero yield impact from the lithography
step. In addition, steppers add automation to the process, since
one operator can control several machines.
 |
Figure
3.
Steppers
utilize 100 percent defect-free reticles with pellicle protection,
contributing zero yield impact from the lithography step.
However, adapting stepper technology to
bump processing has been difficult, primarily because, unlike
contact aligners, these tools are only available with narrow
illumination bandwidths, limiting their exposure capability
to either the g-line or i-line output peaks of the mercury
arc lamp.
|
Process
Tradeoffs
This has forced users who want to implement
stepper technology in their bump process to make process tradeoffs
and commit to either an all i-line or all g-line process even before
purchasing equipment. But there are many different types of bump
processes.
Those with spin-coated photoresists, whose typical
thicknesses range from 10 to 40 microns, are typically g-line sensitive.
Processes with dry film laminate photoresists, with thicknesses
of 100 to 150 microns, are typically i-line sensitive. Many fabs
want the flexibility of using both types of photosensitive films.
A second problem with steppers is that they have required tool-specific
alignment targets.
Bump-bond processing is a back-end application
that requires aligning to existing product layouts that have already
been fabricated on the customer's existing steppers. In virtually
all cases, retooling of the customer's reticle sets to include additional
stepper-specific targets for bump-level lithography is not a viable
option. Nor is it feasible for a foundry to either limit its bump-bond
business to customers that only use the same manufacturer's stepper,
or to purchase steppers from a wide variety of manufacturers.
Steppers also cannot easily handle multiple
wafer sizes and thickness variations, or wafers with severe warpage
(50 to 100 microns).
Typically, it can take up to a week to change
wafer sizes, an amount of downtime that bump foundries and packaging
facilities can't afford. The need for multiple wafer-size flexibility
is becoming especially important now that bump foundries are being
required to offer multiple wafer-size processing capabilities.
In addition, wafer steppers are unable to align
and expose both thin and thick photo-resist films due to their limited
focus range. The high-resolution, precisely controlled focus mechanisms
typically found in stepper technology are ideal for processing high-
resolution, thin-film photoresists.
This high-precision focus control, however,
typically limits the total range of focus positioning to approximately
10 microns, making it impossible to adjust the focus over the broader
range required on thick films, particularly those in excess of 40
to 50 microns.
Finally, steppers have a relatively low wafer-
plane intensity that limits throughput for high-dose exposures.
|