| Area Array Package I/O
Pitch Will Continue to Decline |
The adoption rate of new IC packages has been-and
will continue to be-governed by several factors: the cost of the
packages, available infrastructure, the compatibility with existing
technology and the ability of PC board assemblers to reliably route
and place the packages to the board.
The semiconductor industry's ability to design
and assemble very small, fine-pitch packages exceeds the practical
limits of placing the devices reliably and cost-effectively on most
production boards. Routing and placing these very small packages
cost-effectively on a board has been the focal point of many discussions
and has inhibited package designers from decreasing the pitch to
the smallest proportions possible.
The ability or willingness to handle these very
fine pitches varies by region. For example, while many Japanese
assemblers could work with leaded packages with I/O pitch as low
as 0.3 mm, most U.S. PC board assemblers were never comfortable
with leaded-package pitch below 0.5 mm. As a result, leaded packages
with a pitch less than 0.5 mm are fairly rare in the United States.
 |
 |
By
Steve Berry and Sandra Winkler
Contributing Editors |
A
Less Demanding I/O Pitch
Although array packages were originally created
to meet the needs of high I/O-count devices, they have also provided
the benefit of a less demanding I/O pitch-typically 1.27 mm for
"full-sized" BGAs and 0.8 mm for CSPs. However, this pitch will
drop to accommodate the continuing quest for smaller package footprints.
For array packages, multiplying I/O pitch by I/O count essentially
determines package footprint. Since I/O count is determined by device
function, lowering I/O pitch remains the only way to reduce the
footprint of most array packages.
When the I/O pitch is lowered to where that
die size begins to control the package footprint, the package has
become a CSP. By our definition, CSPs begin at no more than 1.0-mm
pitch and end at die size. However, except for devices with very
large die and modest I/O count (e.g. DRAMs), the crossover between
BGAs and CSPs does not take place until 0.8-mm pitch or below.
The table presents our I/O pitch forecast for
BGAs and CSPs. BGAs are generally at 1.27-mm or 1.0-mm pitch, although
there are some below that figure. The trend is for a smaller pitch
in the future, for an increased amount of BGAs at 0.8-mm pitch.
CSPs are generally at 0.8-mm pitch, with 0.5-mm in most product
roadmaps.
Significant
Increase
There will be a significant increase in the number
of 0.5-mm pitch CSPs by 2003, but this will not be led by DRAMs.
The typical DRAM die is large in relation to its I/O count and does
not need 0.5-mm pitch. The move to the smaller pitch will be led
by a variety of small-die devices used in handheld products.
|
Electronic
Trend Publications (ETP) is a market research firm
specializing in all phases of electronics manufacturing, from
wafer fabrication through final assembly. Visit ETP's Web
site at electronictrendpubs.com
for more information. Contact Steve Berry or Sandra Winkler
by e-mail at info@electronictrendpubs.com
or by phone at 408.369.7000.
|
|