| Is Flip-Chip a Case of
the Right Technology Before Its Time? |
|
Flip-chip assembly has become popular for laminate BGA single-chip
packages, yet the technology has been slow to move into chip-scale
packaging.
The advantages of flip-chip assembly for devices with more
than 600 I/O are well understood.
Flip-chip assembly provides high-performance electrical interconnection,
high-speed first-level attachment to the substrate, chip-size
reduction for pad-limited chips, and heat removal from the
back of the chip.
|
 |
|
By
Robert Crowley Contributing Editor
|
Many companies have investigated flip-chip-on-laminate
CSPs to realize these benefits for chips with 100 to 200 I/O, but
few have moved into high-volume production. Is this a case of using
the wrong technology for the packaging problem or using the right
technology before it is ready?
Companies such as Motorola and NEC have made
considerable investments in flip-chip technology for laminate packages
barely larger than the chip itself.
The technical issues related to process optimization,
wafer bumping and material selection have been resolved, and the
packages pass qualification tests. However, these packages have
not moved into production as expected, and the primary reason is
high cost.
For chips with 100 to 200 I/O, wire bonding
remains less expensive. Once again, a technologically superior package
has failed to replace a lower cost existing package. Note, however,
that flip-chip on ceramic chip-scale packages have been in production
for years by companies such as Matsushita.
The cost structure for flip-chip packages depends
largely on the cost of the substrate and the cost of wafer bumping.
Low-Cost
Wafer Bumping
Thin, laminate substrates with microvias and
fine-line wiring still demand a price premium. Low-cost wafer bumping
is becoming more readily available with a variety of solutions,
including electroless nickel bumping, solder paste printing, solder
electroplating and stud-bump bonding.
 |
Advanced packages are often marketed on
technical superiority. Observations of many new package introductions
suggests that new package technology will displace existing
technology in two situations: where the new package allows
for overall system-level cost reductions, or where the packaging
requirements cannot be met by the existing package technology.
|
| High-performance
CSPs will use wafer-level and flip-chip assembly. |
It remains difficult to see how flip-chip packages
will ever cost less than wire-bonded packages for relatively simple
chips. Changes in packaging requirements, however, will inevitably
lead to a demand for more flip-chip CSPs. Increasing clock rates
and increasing heat dissipation will make plastic-encapsulated wire-bonded
packages unsuitable for many applications.
Two
Options
Two packages styles can help here: flip-chip
laminate CSPs and wafer-level CSPs. While small chips with few I/O
are natural candidates for wafer-level packaging, chips with more
than 100 I/O will move more towards the flip-chip laminate CSP.
As ICs are designed for flip-chip assembly from
the start, the cost of bumping will decrease, because the redistribution
layer can be incorporated in the final metal layer instead of being
added in the bumping process. Combine this with cost reductions
in microvia substrates, and the cost premium for flip-chip packages
will decrease. It appears that flip-chip laminate CSPs are the right
technology for applications that need the performance, and these
CSPs were developed before the true market demand developed.
|
Mr. Crowley is president of Redpoint Research,
a technology analysis and consulting company in the microelectronics
packaging field. He can be reached at crowley@redpointresearch.com.
|
|