Media Kit
For advertisements and demographics
click here
 
 Current Advertisers

List of the sponsors

 Publisher's Letter
Some Thoughts about Golf
 
 Assembly Lines
Y2K Thoughts: To Look Forward, You Have to Look Back!
 
 Electronic Trends
Area Array Package I/O Pitch Will Continue to Decline
 
 Small Talk
Is Flip-Chip a Case of the Right Technology Before Its Time?
 
 Wafer - Level Watch

`One-Size-Fits-All' Thinking Must Change for Wafer Level

 
 Harvey Miller's Notebook
It's a New Market Phase for Flex-Based Semiconductor Packages
 
 On Test
Test Process Choices Influence Cost, Throughput and ATE Design
 
 Industry News
Get Higher Yields or Your Money Back!
Merger of AMT, Hana Creates $300 Million Company
People in The News
Company News
Calendar of Events
 
 Features
The Bandwagon Starts to Roll for Lead-Free Electronics
A Primer on Lead-Free Solder
Lead - Free Chip-Scale Soldering of Packages
A Period of Adjustment
An Expert Looks at the Issues™
Integrated Assembly and Strip Test of Chip-Scale Packages
Dispensing Equipment: Getting Smarter and More Automated
Are Chip-Scale Packages and Known-Good Die Competitors or Teammates?
Site Synergy and Short Cycle Times Drive Advanced Packaging in Europe
 
 Contacts
Industry Contacts
 
 Opinion
As Device Complexity Increases, Final Test Grows in Importance
 
 Patents
Patent Employs Modified TAB Technology to Produce CSPs
 
 Tools & Technologies
Dynacraft Offers Low-Cost CSP Leadframe and more
 
 Archives
2000
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec
1999
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec
1998
  Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec

  Subscription
Free U.S. Subscription Form


 
 
An Independent Journal Dedicated to the Advancement of Chip - Scale Electronics
March - April 2000

Email the editor

 Lead - Free Chip-Scale Soldering of Packages

A host of lead-free solder replacements are coming to the fore, each presenting the user with certain tradeoffs. Many of the replacement solder systems are based on adding a small quantity of a third or fourth element to binary alloy systems to lower the solder's melting point, which increases wetting and reliability.

By Dr. Ning-Cheng Lee
Indium Corporation of America
Clinton, New York

Packaging trends have progressively moved toward the smaller, faster, lighter and cheaper: from fine-pitch SMT to area-array packaging; and from ball grid array (BGA) to chip-scale packages and to flip chip.

Area-array packaging now provides great benefits at both the chip and component levels. CSPs are particularly attractive, in the sense that they deliver a nice balance between miniaturization and manufacturability.

The interconnect technology for BGAs and CSPs has also evolved over time. Although many methods have been developed, they can be roughly categorized into three groups:

     1. Liquid-metal bonding (soldering)

     2. Solid-metal bonding (wire bonding, TAB, etc.)

     3. Metal-filled polymer bonding (ani-sotropic conductive adhesive, isotropic conductive adhesive, etc.)

Soldering is by far the preferred approach for interconnecting area-array packages. This is especially true for the second-level assembly stage of BGAs and CSPs.

Alloys Used for CSP Interconnects

The choice of solder alloys is determined by the requirements of both process and reliability.

Initially, besides meeting the solder wetting requirement, the solder chosen should be able to maintain its physical and mechanical integrity during subsequent processing. In this way, at the end of the packaging and assembly processes, the solder joints formed initially will not be altered or ruined.

For CSPs, interconnecting solder materials are usually introduced at two stages. The first is a pre-deposit of solder onto the packaging, usually accomplished through solder bumping. The solder-bumped package is then mounted onto the next level of packaging through soldering.

The soldering process here may or may not need the introduction of additional solder materials. The additional materials may or may not be the same solder alloy as the solder bump on the packaging.

When additional solder materials are needed, they are often introduced through either solder coating onto the next level of packaging or the use of solder-paste deposition as a bonding medium.

Alloys Used in FC Solder Bumping and Soldering

For flip-chip in component (FCIP), the solders utilized for FC solder bumping and joining must normally have high melting points, such as 97Pb3Sn or 95Pb5Sn. For direct chip attach (DCA) or flip-chip on board (FCOB) applications, the solders utilized for flip-chip bumping, as well as the solder coating on the next-level packaging, often are eutectic or near-eutectic lead/tin solders.

Alloys Used in BGA and CSP Solder Bumping and Soldering

For heavy components, such as CCGA or CBGA devices, the solder used for either column or ball is typically 90Pb10Sn.

The column is mounted onto the CSP via either casting or 63Sn37Pb solder joining. For CBGAs, the 90Pb10Sn solder ball is typically mounted via 63Sn37Pb solder paste soldering.

The high melting point of 90Pb10Sn solder ensures the required standoff of CCGA or CBGA on PCBs during board-level soldering assembly using eutectic 63Sn37Pb or 62Sn36Pb2Ag solders.

For light components such as PBGA devices, the components are bumped with 63Sn37Pb or 62Sn36Pb2Ag and soldered onto the board, either with flux alone, or with solder pastes, using similar alloy systems.

With CSPs, the alloys used are similar to those employed with PBGAs. The use of solder paste, rather than flux alone, for board-level assembly is recommended.

Lead-Free Solders

Lead-free soldering for electronics is a global trend toward a lead-free environment, and the favored Pb-free solder alternatives vary from region to region.

In general, however, high-tin alloys are preferred. These include Sn/Ag, Sn/Cu, Sn/Ag/Cu, Sn/Ag/Bi and various versions of those alloys with small amounts of other elements, such as Sb.

Sn/Ag/Bi systems are currently employed in some Japanese products. However, Sn/Ag/Cu systems are more tolerant toward Pb contamination than bismuth-containing systems and are therefore more compatible with the existing infrastructure during this transition stage.

The application will dictate the specific Pb-free alloy chosen for different applications. Pb-free solder systems suitable for CSP soldering applications are primarily alloys of Sn with Ag, Bi, Cu, Sb, In or Zn, as shown in Table 1.

These alloys may serve as substitutes for eutectic Sn/Pb solders in CSP interconnects. However, substitutes for high-melting-temperature solders have not yet been developed.

Table 1.
Lead-Free Solders for CSP Applications
Melting Temperature Range o(C)
Solder Alloy
227
99.3Sn0.7Cu
221
96.5Sn3.5Ag
221-226
98Sn2Ag
205-213
93.5Sn3.5Ag3Bi
207-212
90.5Sn7.5Bi2Ag
200-216
91.8Sn3.4Ag4.8Bi
226-228
97Sn2Cu0.8Sb0.2Ag
213-218
96.2Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.5Sb
232-240
95Sn5Sb
189-199
89Sn8Zn3Bi
138
58Bi42Sn
217-219
95.5Sn4Ag0.5Cu
216-218
93.6Sn4.7Ag1.7Cu
217-219
95.5Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu
217-218
96.3Sn3.2Ag0.5Cu
217-219
95Sn4Ag1Cu

Let's look at some of the more promising alloys, and their characteristic advantages and disadvantages, as applied to the CSP attachment process. Many of the systems are based on adding a small quantity of a third or fourth element to binary alloy systems to lower the alloy's melting point and increase wetting and reliability.

Researchers have reported that, with increasing amounts of additive elements, the melting point of the system first decreases. The bond strength then rapidly decreases, almost levels off, then decreases again. Finally, the wettability increases rapidly at first, reaching its maximum at a composition corresponding to the midpoint of the plateau of bond strength, before it decreases.

Note the following examples:

Sn99.3/Cu0.7

Sn99.3/Cu0.7 (227oC) is reported to have soldering qualities equal to eutectic Sn/Pb in telephone manufacturing. In air reflow, however, wettability is reduced, and the fillet exhibits a rough and textured appearance. This composition is probably the "poorest" in mechanical properties available from all Pb-free solders. This is best suited for use in wave soldering, because the materials cost and the inverting of waves is not costly.

Sn96.5/Ag3.5

Sn96.5/Ag3.5 (221oC) is considered one of the most promising by NCMS, Ford, Motorola and TI Japan. A German study1 suggests that it is one of the most suitable alloys. There is a long history of use for this alloy. Indium Corp., however, reported that it offers the poorest wetting for reflow soldering among high-Sn alloys.

Sn/Ag/Cu

This is a ternary eutectic at 217oC, although the exact composition is to be clarified. Cu is added to Sn/Ag to slow the Cu dissolution and lower the melting temperature. This improves wettability, creep and thermal fatigue characteristics. Nokia and Multicore found that yields and reliability are comparable to or better than eutectic Sn/Pb alloy2. The Brite-Euram project reported better reliability and solderability than Sn/Ag and Sn/Cu, and recommended this alloy for general-purpose use3.

Sn/Ag/Cu/X

Sn96.2/Ag2.5/Cu0.8/Sb0.5 (213-218oC, AIM, Castin Alloy) is reported by the International Tin Research Institute, Ford, Lucent and Sandia Labs to have greater fatigue performance than a eutectic Sn/Pb alloy4. The Brite-Euram Project reported that a 0.5% Sb addition may strengthen the alloy further. Sn97/Cu2/Sb0.8/Ag0.2 (226-228oC, Kester, SAF-ALLOY) may be considered for wave- and hand-soldering applications. Sn/Ag/Cu/In (Tamura) may also be promising.

Sn/Ag/Bi/X

The addition of < 5% Bi lowers the melting point and improves the wettability of Sn/Ag systems. With this alloy, solderability is the best among a range of Pb-free materials, confirmed by Indium Corp., and Matsushita. NCMS observed fillet lifting at throughhole joints as a concern for wave soldering, although other alloys, such as Sn96.5/Ag3.5, also suffer fillet lifting to a lesser extent.

Fillet lift is caused by the mismatch in TCE between solder and PWB materials and is aggravated by solders with a pasty range. It can be altered by the addition of other elements.

The addition of Cu and/or Ge results in strength improvement and possibly a wettability improvement. Adding Pb to Sn/Bi alloys can cause a 96oC ternary eutectic Bi52/Pb32/Sn16 to form. Calculations predict that at a fixed 6% Pb, even alloys with < 4.8% Bi can have this eutectic liquid form, hence one should avoid Sn/Pb surface finishes.

The addition of a large amount (˜5-20%) of Bi lowers the melting point of eutectic Sn/Pb solders but loses the good properties of eutectic Sn/Ag systems. Moreover, low temperature eutectic Bi58/Sn42, which has a low partial melting point (138oC), occurs. There are also reliability concerns, such as interfacial problems, with plating containing Pb on the electrodes of electronic components.

Sn/Sb

Sn95/Sb5 (232-240oC) offers poor wetting, although better than Sn96.5/Ag3.5, and its liquidus temperature is too high.

Sn/Zn/X

Sn91/Zn9 (eutectic 199oC) is fairly reactive, since Zn causes oxidation and corrosion, and reacts with flux to form a hardened paste. In Sn89/Zn8/Bi3, Bi replaces Zn to reduce the Zn corrosion in humid conditions. Sn/Zn/Bi alloys can have a melting point close to eutectic Sn/Pb. This alloy was developed primarily by home electronics manufacturers targeting low-cost products.

Sn/Bi

Bi58/Sn42 (138oC) is recommended by NCMS as a promising replacement, and eutectic Bi58/Sn42 is unusually resistant to coarsening. It is reported by HP5 to have properties equivalent to or better than eutectic Sn/Pb. It shows promise for low-temperature applications or some consumer products.

The addition of 1% Cu dramatically slows the coarsening of eutectic Sn/Bi. The concerns, however, include eutectic Bi52/Pb32/Sn16 (96oC) formed on Pb surface finishes, furthermore, Bi is a by-product of Pb mining.

The Cost of Pb-Free Alloys

The cost of solder bar is dictated by the cost of raw materials (Table 2). However, for fabricated products such as solder pastes, the processing cost of manufacturing this material can become a dominant factor, and the difference between Sn/Pb and Pb-free materials becomes very small.

Table 2.
Relative Cost of Lead-Free Solder Materials
Solder Alloy Bar Relative Cost ($/Kg) Paste Relative Cost ($/Kg)
Sn63/Pb37 1 1
Sn96.5/Ag3.5 2.29 1.07
Sn95/Ag3/Bi2 2.17 1.06
Sn96.1/Ag2.6/Cu0.8/Sb0.5 2.06 1.05
Sn91.8/Ag3.4/Bi4.8 2.26 1.06
Sn95/Ag3.5/Cu0.5/Zn1 2.27 1.06
Sn93.6/Ag4.7/Cu1.7 2.56 1.08
Sn96.1/Ag3.2/Cu0.7 2.21 1.06
Sn95.2/Ag3.5/Cu1.3 2.28 1.06
* Relative cost of selected metals:
Pb - 1, Zn - 1.7, Cu - 3, Sb - 3.9, Bi - 8.6, Sn - 11, Ag - 260, Au - 15000

Thermal Damage

There is more to ponder about the substitution of Pb-free alloys in CSP soldering besides simply phasing out lead.

Since most of the promising alloy alternatives require a higher processing temperature, whether the components or substrates used can sustain the process becomes a big question.

For instance, electrolytic capacitors are highly susceptible to high-temperature damage.

Wound components, such as relays, are also susceptible to high-temperature damage. It is also considered likely that plastic-encapsulated ICs may show an increased tendency to "popcorn," as the alloy nears its expiration date.

Additionally, parametric damage to memory ICs processed at around 250oC is possible. As mentioned earlier, PWB and BGA polymeric substrates and solder masks may also suffer from higher processing temperatures. This is particularly true for flexible circuitry. The plastic insulation of connectors may also become distorted.

The corrosion and electromigration tendencies of Pb-free alloys need to be measured. Pastes and fluxes need to be evaluated. Since solder without Pb is different in appearance and is more difficult to monitor via X-ray, new standards for visual and X-ray inspection are needed, especially with packages such as BGAs, where X-ray inspection of visually inaccessible areas may be commonplace.

Conclusion

There are a number of promising Pb-free alloys that may be considered viable for soldering CSPs.

The appropriate alloy for the job will depend in many ways on the individual application, the width of its process window, the limitations (such as thermal), placed on the process by the CSP packages used, the PWB material, etc.

Process development on the part of the individual manufacturer is needed to determine which alloy will ultimately be the most appropriate replacement.

References

     1. S. Wege, G. Habenicht and R. Bergmann, "Manufacture and Reliability of Alternate Solder Alloys," SMI, San Jose, Calif., p. 699-704.

     2. T. Laine-Ylijoki, H. Steen and A. Forsten, "Development and Validation of a Lead-Free Alloy for Solder Paste Applications," IEEE Trans-actions on Components, Packaging, and Manuf-acturing Technology, Vol. 20, No. 3, July, 1997, p. 194-198.

     3. B. P. Richards, C. L. Levoguer, et. al, "An Analysis of the Current Status of Lead-Free Soldering," DTI Report, May, 1999.

     4. K. Nimmo, "Review of current Issues in Lead-Free Soldering," SMI, San Jose, Calif., 1997, p. 467-475.

     5. J. Glazer, "Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Pb-Free Solder Alloys for Low-Cost Electronic Assembly: a Review," J. Electronic Materials, Vol. 23, No. 8, August, 1994, p. 693-700.

Dr. Lee is vice president of technology for Indium Corp. Prior to joining Indium in 1986, he was at Morton Chemical and SCM.

He has spent more than 14 years in the development of fluxes and solder pastes for SMT industries. Dr. Lee received a bachelors degree in chemistry from the National Taiwan University and received his Ph.D. in polymer science from the University of Akron (Ohio). Readers may contact him at nclee@indium.com or by phone at 315.853-4900.

 
 
  Copyright (C) 2000