| |
| `One-Size-Fits-All' Thinking
Must Change for Wafer Level |
|
In the eyes of a two-year-old, a dog is
any furry creature that walks on four legs. The single descriptor
dog finds general-purpose use around the family, covering
a full menagerie including dogs, cats, mice, horses and even
baby sisters. As the toddler matures, he learns that it is
not as cute as it once was to call his little sister a dog.
With maturity comes the ability to distinguish subtle differences
between members of a class.
While wafer-level packaging is still in
its infancy, it includes a growing range of tech-nologies.
Now, at several years of age, it is time that we begin to
differentiate between the various types and their applications.
|
 |
|
By
Dr. Tom Di Stefano
Contributing Editor
|
The "one-size-fits-all" approach fails in this
area where different requirements drive each application segment.
Rather than one wafer-level packaging paradigm, we find several
approaches in which each one is shaped by the dominant factors driving
the segment. We also learn quickly that not all wafer-level packages
provide equivalent function.
Certain technologies are moving rapidly to fill
specific applications while others are years away from the market.
Dallas Semiconductor and National Semiconductor,
for example, already have wafer-level packaged chips on the market,
while those pursuing more demanding and complex applications are
still in the laboratory stages of development.
Among the first to use wafer-level packaging
are low I/O applications, because they require no drastic changes
to the infrastructure for packaging or system assembly. Most are
using adaptations of mature flip-chip technologies that are finished
into a surface mountable IC.
Reliability requirements are easier to meet
on these small chips than on the larger memory or processor ICs.
Thermal mismatch is less important because of the small chip size.
Designing with these chips is straightforward, even at a grid pitch
of 0.5 mm, because circuit board wiring is adequate to wire the
low I/O footprints.
Early applications include integrated-passives,
power-conditioning chips and discrete devices.
Development
Activity
A considerable amount of development activity
is aimed at memory chips for which the challenges and rewards are
greater. The cost saving of wafer level production is driving this
activity to lower package cost, and to more efficient burn-in, test
and production logistics.
Even with this high level of activity, we are
several years away from full wafer-level production of memory chips,
because of technical issues in reliability, wafer burn-in and infrastructure.
Early prototypes from Fujitsu, OKI, TIJ and others show promise
for the future, with more to follow.
The memory sector is particularly important
to watch, since it has the ability to set protocols and standards
for the industry. Watch for solutions to wafer burn-in and test
that can be used in ASICS and processors. The protocols that evolve
for high volume memory, moreover, will influence other sectors,
helping them to resolve issues in handling, logistics, reliability
and shipping.
Benefits
Processors and ASICS stand to reap the greatest
benefits from the move to wafer-level packaging, but they are not
leading the pack because of a range of technological problems.
In these high-performance chips, power and ground
distribution in the package promises higher performance, while reducing
the need for higher pin count.
The package is also being considered for critical
intra-chip wiring of clock trees and other RC limited on-chip networks.
High-density interconnect capability is needed to satisfy these
requirements, in addition to the other challenges of wafer-level
packaging.
Building this entire infrastructure will take
time.
We can understand this field better by considering
separately the applications in low I/O, passives, memory, processors
and others as they emerge.
|
Dr. Di Stefano is a chip-scale packaging
pioneer, a prodigious author and inventor and a founder of
Tessera. He is currently president of Decision Track, Mountain
View, Calif., and may be reached at tdistefano@decisiontrack.com.
|
|
|