| It
appears unlikely that there will be any legislative efforts
to ban lead in the U.S. electronics industry. Other issues however,
make it probable that the domestic industry will follow the
example of Europe and Japan. |
|
The
Effect of Lead-Free Assembly on the Semiconductor Industry
|
By
Dr. Greg Jones
KIC Thermal Profiling San Diego, California
With the arrival of the 21st century, the shift
to lead-free electronic assembly appears to be a certainty. Barring
unforeseen developments, the production and import of leaded solders
and electronic components will be banned in Europe by 2004. In Japan,
the electronics industry is voluntarily removing lead from its products.
Each company has set its own goals, with some, like Sony, planning
to be completely lead-free by 2001. Most plan to become lead-free
between 2002 and 2005.
To date, there has been no discussion of banning
imports containing lead from the Japanese market. Given the environmental
issues driving the shift, however, this issue will surface eventually.
In the United States, the situation is more
ambiguous. While it appears unlikely that there will be any legislative
efforts to ban lead in the domestic electronics industry, other
issues make it likely that the U.S.-based industry will follow the
European and Japanese examples.
The
Situation
In the past year, there was some uncertainty in
the U.S. over whether the European directive would be implemented.
It is now certain that the WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment)
directive will be implemented. This implementation has been recognized
by the major U.S. trade associations. Follow-ing IPC Works99, where
an international summit on lead-free electronics assembly was held,
there can be little doubt that lead-free is not just coming but is
here1.
Legal
Status
Japan:
Japan has a severe problem with solid waste.
All available landfill is expected to be filled by 2007. The Japanese
are very concerned with removing toxins from their environment and
want to remove lead from waste to prevent its leaching into groundwater.
In 1998, the Japanese Electronics Industries
Association decided to voluntarily eliminate lead from electronic
assemblies. The goal of the association is for half of Japanese
electronics production to be lead-free by 2002, and to be completely
lead-free by 2004.
Europe:
The final draft of the WEEE Directive was to
be completed in January. It is certain that electronic assemblies
containing lead will be banned from the European Union as of January
2004.
The motivation behind this ban is that electronics
waste is growing at a rate three times greater than other solid
wastes. This huge increase in the amount of electronics waste has
raised concerns about lead leaching into water supplies.
United States:
Ironically, the initial impulse for lead-free
electronics originated in the United States. Following the ban on
leaded plumbing solders in the early 1980s, electronics assembly
was seen as the next logical industry from which to remove lead.
The Reid Act of 1992, an omnibus environ-mental
bill, would have done that, but it was defeated. Currently, there
is no legislation proposing a ban on leaded solder; still, there
are some legal threats on the horizon.
For example, the EPA may reduce the regulatory
limit on lead as a hazardous material from 10,000 pounds per year
to 10 pounds per year, making almost every user of leaded solders
subject to EPA regulation, reporting and inspection.
It is unlikely that leaded solders will be banned
in the United States in the near future, but there are many compelling
reasons that will motivate most U.S. electronics assemblers to go
lead-free.
International:
One further issue of concern to all electronics
manufacturers is that the European ban and the potential for a Japanese
ban may touch off trade disputes. Anyone who has followed the disputes
over relatively "insignificant" products, such as bananas, knows
that we must avoid a major trade war involving one of the world's
largest and most critical industries.
Marketing
Advantages
Many observers of the lead-free solder issue
feel that the legal points are moot, and that marketing considerations
alone will force a change to lead-free electronics in the near future.
Japanese electronics manufacturers have taken
the lead in "green" marketing. Panasonic's lead-free mini-disc player,
packaged with a green leaf environmentally safe symbol and released
in October 1998, has gained significant increases in market share,
moving from 4.7% of the mini-disc market to 15%2
In the U.S., Ford Motor Company has launched
what is perhaps the largest green marketing campaign to date. Ford
has gone on record declaring that its electronic assemblies will
be lead-free by 2002. Its vehicles, the company promises, will be
lead-free by 2004.
Green marketing is viewed as becoming a powerful
and effective marketing tool, and many electronics manufacturers
are going to take advantage of it by going lead-free.
The
Next Hurdle
Controversy over lead-free solders has shifted from
whether they are adequate replacements for traditional lead/tin
solders to which possible replacement alloy will be selected as
a new standard. This standard will be critical.
Currently, electronic assemblies can be repaired
worldwide with standard leaded solder. There are numerous solderability
and wetting issues between lead solders and lead-free solders. Among
these issues, lead-free solders wet poorly to components with leads
that contain lead.
Further muddying the waters are compatibility
issues among various lead-free alloys. It is imperative that the
global electronics industry settle on a single standard alloy to
ensure that assemblies can be repaired expeditiously and reliably.
Another downstream issue is recyclability of assemblies. A single
standard alloy will make it much more feasible to recover and recycle
base metals.
To date, most paste suppliers and many electronics
manufacturers have developed proprietary alloys. Obviously, it is
in the best interests of the holders of these patents to have their
alloy selected as the standard, and an enormous amount of research
is being done to establish a winner. There are also many unpatented
alternatives.
The alloys that appear most likely to become
the industry standard are Sn/Ag/Cu and Sn/Ag/Bi. The choice between
the two involves a tradeoff. Sn/Ag/Cu provides solder joints that
may be as reliable as the current Pb/Sn alloys and features liquidus
temperatures around 217oC.
The majority of Americans and Europeans favor
an Sn/Ag/Cu alloy as the standard because of its potential for greater
reliability and lower cost, while acknowledging that the higher
process temperatures that these alloys require present a challenge
for assemblers.
The bismuth alloys provide solder joints that
are in some ways inferior to those provided by current leaded solders
(due mostly to a phenomenon known as "fillet lifting") and offer
liquidus temperatures ranging from 206oC to 213oC.
Bismuth alloys, which appear to provide adequate
reliability for most consumer uses, are preferred by some because
they are the closest thing to a "drop in" replacement for leaded
solders. These alloys are also favored by the Japanese and are currently
used in the lead-free electronic assemblies that are on the market.
The bismuth alloys are more expensive than Sn/Ag/Cu
alloys, however, and there are concerns that the world's current
bismuth resources may be inadequate to meet prospective demand.
Further concerns are, that as a lead byproduct, bismuth may be subject
to a later ban, and that bismuth alloy solders are difficult to
produce in wire form.
Both bismuth alloys and Sn/Ag/Cu alloys are
being extensively tested and will be used in volume production beginning
this year. An additional factor affecting the choice of a standard
alloy is that the Sn/Ag/Cu alloys are favored by the automotive
industry, because their higher melting points will give better reliability
in under-hood applications. Further testing needs to be done on
the reliability characteristics of both alloys before an informed
desision on a standard alloy can be made.
The
Challenge
The move to lead-free electronics assembly presents
component makers with a three-part challenge: First, they must remove
lead from their products; next, they must develop leads that are
compatible with lead-free solders; and, eventually, they will need
to develop components with higher temperature tolerances.
The first two tasks must be completed to successfully
assemble products that meet European standards. This leaves the
question of whether component manufacturers will be able to raise
their temperature tolerances in the short term.
Over the longer term, the question is whether raising
the process temperature limits of components will be economically
justifiable, or even necessary.
Technical
Problems
The chief technical problems associated with the adoption
of lead-free electronic assembly are:
Component
lead solderability issues:
There are serious issues with solder joints
between leaded leads and lead-free solders. Alternative lead finishes,
that are mostly palladium-based, have been developed.
The fallout on this issue will be chiefly economic,
involving the costs associated with developing and implementing
new processes, as well as the greater expense of more costly lead-finish
materials.
Alloy selection:
It is critical that a common replacement for Sn63Pb37
leaded solder be agreed on by the worldwide electronics industry.
The IPC is aggressively pursuing agreement on a common alloy. This
will be discussed at the IPC's winter meeting and also at APEX.
The goal is a short list of potential standard alloys by this April.
The effects
of lead-free assembly on sophisticated modern ICs, such as BGAs:
The main issues are the effects of higher reflow
temperatures on IC package substrates and the reliability of lead-free
solder joints, specifically shear strength and intermetallic growth.
While research is being conducted by most of
the semiconductor industry's major players, very few of their findings
have been made public.
|