| Site Synergy and Short
Cycle Times Drive Advanced Packaging in Europe |
Wireless
communications are reshaping the electronics industry in Europe.
The requirements from this sector are the major drivers influencing
industry trends.
By
Steve Lerner and Claudio Truzzi, CS2, Zaventem, Belgium
Wireless communications have recently become
the dominant sector of the electronics industry in Europe.
Smaller size and higher system performance at
lower cost, are the key requirements of this sector, pushing the
envelope of advanced packaging technologies. In addition, semiconductor
suppliers and packaging foundries are responding more rapidly to
the needs of equipment manufacturers who face shorter product life
cycles, requiring quicker time-to-market.
In
1999, more than one mobile phone out of two sold worldwide was made
in Europe (Ref. 1), and the
cellular/PCS base-station equipment sector is also dominated by
European companies. The requirements from this sector, in fact,
have become the major drivers influencing industry trends.
New
Solutions
This article analyzes how these requirements
are stimulating new IC packaging solutions and how the electronics
industry supply chain is being reshaped to cope with those needs.
In terms of new solutions, portable electronic
devices with slim designs require very thin package constructions.
Currently, the industry targets package designs of less than 1.2
mm overall height, measured from the upper side of the package down
to the surface of the underlying PWB.
Chip-scale packages, or BGAs based on flexible
tape or very thin laminate substrates, offer the potential to deliver
solutions to these challenges. Traditionally, flex has been the
most widespread CSP-substrate technology, accounting for about half
of all CSPs. (Ref. 2) This substrate's market position
has been due largely to its high circuit density.
Today, however, the availability of very thin
laminate substrates with improved design rules has enabled the manufacture
of ultra-thin, laminate-based BGAs (0.9 mm). The telecom sector
in Europe is rapidly adopting this ultra-thin, laminate-based package
option because it provides better board-level reliability than flex.
Figure 1 shows the results of a Finite Element Model
(FEM) analysis of die stress for BT-resin laminate BGA and flex-based
BGA. The model is a 12 mm X 12 mm package with an 8 mm X 8 mm die.
The thickness measures 1.1 mm for both packages. Maximum solder
ball stress for flex-based BGAs is 54% higher. Maximum substrate
deflection for flex-based BGAs is 70% higher. Analyses performed
on other package sizes deliver comparable results.
 |
Figure
1a) Stress
analysis for a BT-laminate BGA. The maximum solder ball stress
is 43.6 N/mm2 and maximum substrate deflection is 14.3 µm. |
 |
Figure
1b) Stress
analysis for a flex BGA. The maximum solder ball stress is 84.2
N/mm2 (54% increase); the maximum substrate deflection is
25.4 µm, a 70% increase. |
Additionally, the flexible nature of flex-tape
substrates makes it difficult to handle them during manufacturing-each
process step has its own mechanical and space requirements for holding
the flex tape and handling it properly, considerably lowering the
range of assembly options.
In contrast, rigid laminate substrates do not
suffer from this limitation and can be processed using the existing
assembly infrastructure, which enables a better cost/performance
ratio.
Stacked
CSPs
Stacked CSPs, where multiple die are mounted
on top of one another in a very thin package (less than 1.4 mm),
offer a good solution when the ICs can share the same signals, such
as address and data bus for Flash and SRAM memories.
This solution is being rapidly adopted by the
telecom sector. A proposal for an industry-wide standard for stacked
multi-chip packages (MCPs) for SRAM and flash memory products, (originally
drafted by Toshiba, Fujitsu and NEC), is currently under review
by JEDEC, the standards organization.
For memory, two or more chips in one package
minimize package size and assembly area, reduce board area and weight
and will support higher memory densities in the future. This pin
assignment solution supports a range of densities from 4 Mb-128
Mb flash memory and from 1 Mb-128 Mb of SRAM.
To meet the needs of the telecom sector, the
overall thickness of the MCP will have to be reduced to less than
1 mm.
Lead-free
Packaging
Lead is one of the most extensively used chemical
elements on earth, with applications in batteries, roofing materials,
fuel additives, board assembly and packaging. Electronic packaging
primarily employs eutectic Sn63Pb37 solder. Some 50,000 tons are
used annually worldwide.
Very recently, the move towards lead-free assembly
and packaging in Europe, originally scheduled by EU directive for
2004 (Ref. 3), was dramatically accelerated by the requirements
coming, again, from the wireless communications market sector. This
market will require lead-free packages by the year 2001.
Alternative alloys based on different combinations
of a variety of metals, such as tin, silver, copper or bismuth,
almost always require a higher peak temperature during the reflow
profile.
This higher temperature affects warpage of the
interposer and accelerates the formation of intermetallics, which
could lead to brittleness. The use of Pb-free alloys inevitably
modifies the grain structure of the solder balls, the combination
of phases, the defects, morphology and distribution of the phases,
and the intermetallic layer characteristics, as well.
 |
The recently introduced Polymer Stud Grid Array (PSGA) package,
patented by Siemens (Figure 2), and developed in collaboration
with IMEC and CS2, is lead-free by construction and features
excellent board-level reliability.
Figure
2. An 8x8 PSGA package
|
The substrate body is realized by injection
molding and includes a die cavity and studs that replace the solder
balls.
The body is then fully metallized using standard
Cu/Ni/Au plating techniques and patterned with a laser-direct structuring
technique, by which 50-µm spacing between the traces are ablated
to create proper connections between the bond fingers and the studs.
Die-up and die-down options are available.
System-in-a-Package
Most electronic systems can be partitioned in
different clusters. Clusters that are critical, in terms of interconnectivity
requirements, thermal management or signal integrity, can be assembled
and packaged as separate functional blocks.
To be cost effective, these units must be small
(typically less than 1 inch square), possess a low component count
(generally less than five active components), be manufactured using
the standard infrastructure and be "transparent" to the PWB assembler,
i.e. they must be assembled on the board as any other component.
The board assembler should consider these functional
blocks as just another component, regardless of the number of active
devices inside. This approach is emerging for the implementation
of RF functions for front-end applications.
Few RF ICs with very limited pincounts and a
large number of passive components for filtering and biasing purposes
typically realize these functions, however. It is now possible to
implement these functions in single packages by integrating the
passive components into the package itself.
This approach is known as system-in-a-package
(SIP). As opposed to system-on-a-chip (SOC), the SIP approach is
more easily achieved and in many cases provides more cost-effective
solutions with a shorter time-to-market.
Probably one of the strongest points of the
SIP approach is the capability of removing large numbers of discrete
components by integrating them into the substrate itself. Passive
components can be integrated in different substrate types: laminate,
ceramic, silicon or glass.
Customer
Relationship
Until recently, most semiconductor manufacturers
were not too concerned with the parasitic effects of the package,
but this attitude is changing rapidly.
The 1999 International Technology Roadmap for
Semiconductors (Ref. 4) shows that to fulfill the main
requirements for next generation, high-performance ICs, new and
complex packaging technologies will have to be implemented.
IC packaging has become big business, and it's
becoming a complex and costly one, too. As a result, semiconductor
vendors and fabless companies increasingly rely on silicon foundries
for the front-end part of IC manufacturing and a packaging foundry
for assembly, packaging and test.
Today, the introduction of new technologies
in semiconductor processing is increasingly influenced by market
conditions, after technology roadmap issues.
Smaller
size and higher system performance at lower cost, are the key requirements
of the wireless communications industry in Europe and elsewhere,
pushing the envelope of advanced packaging technologies.
In addition, semiconductor suppliers and packaging
foundries are responding more rapidly to the specific needs of application
equipment manufacturers who face shorter product life cycles, requiring
quicker time-to-market.
Customization
One of the main reasons the industry is focusing on
area-array packaging technology (such as BGAs) is because this technology
has the ability to deliver custom or semi-custom packaging solutions.
Apart from the possibilities they offer in response to the ITRS
roadmap, they give IC designers the option of being in control of
packaging development due to the interconnection and pin location
flexibility, instead of being forced to a given, standard package
format.
Chip/Package
Site Synergy
Custom packaging solutions will be the new packaging
trend if they can be delivered with very fast cycle times.
This implies that the assembly contractor should
maintain a close relationship with the customer. First engineering
samples should be returned to the customer in a matter of days,
and production time should be short enough to compete with standard
packages and just-in-time market demands.
Today the chip designer and packager are now
interacting in the course of the chip development. This is in contrast
with standard off-the-shelf packages, where chip designers are not
very concerned about the packaging part of the process.
In this new scenario, package design and characterization
has become an integral part of the chip development flow.
This tight loop between packaging foundry and
IC developer calls for a site synergy between both parties. Clearly,
the need for advanced local packaging services is growing, especially
in Europe, with its strong wireless communications and automotive
industry base.
Locally available, highly automated but flexible
assembly resources enable semiconductor foundries not to miss the
correct market entry point.
One may wonder about the higher costs that could
be incurred when using custom or semi-custom packaging solutions.
Although they are subjected to more frequent NRE costs than standard
packages, this will be largely compensated by their relatively short
production cycle time.
According to McKinsey and Company, a longer
production cycle time causing a late entry in the market, more strongly
influences profits than excessive production costs or unit costs
(Ref. 5). To quote McKinsey, "Profit losses due to a
6-month shipping delay can amount up to ten times the loss due to
a 50% unit cost overrun."
System
Integration
One way to answer the growing need for packaging
miniaturized wireless electronic systems is to integrate different
sub-assemblies or clusters of components into one package. Examples
of such clusters are DSP with SRAM, GSM chipsets and baseband modules
for wireless LAN.
The boundaries that have traditionally existed
between IC design, system design, component handling, board manufacturing,
assembly and test are gradually disappearing. The effects of the
various functions and blocks have to be taken into account from
the early development stages.
This evolution towards "integrated" system integration
is perhaps one of the most important evolutions in the development
of new generation ICs in the past 25 years and has been included
in the latest versions of the roadmaps. In the longer run, it will
reshape the way business is done in the semiconductor industry.
The
Next Step
European packaging foundries focusing on area array
services are already hitting the cutting edge of the BGA roadmap
(Figure 3), as defined by the JEDEC standards: Ultra-thin Fine-pitch
BGA (UFBGA, maximum 1 mm thick, JEDEC STD 95-1) are now qualifying
for the telecom market.
 |
This is also the right time for contract manufacturers
to expand their product and service portfolios by integrating
the next technology wave, wafer-level packaging.
Figure
3. This Spectrum MCM is a module for wireless applications,
and consists of two thin-film substrates and 11 components.
The module's total size is 60 mm x 30 mm (IMEC).
|
This approach packages the die entirely at the
wafer level by fabricating packages for all the ICs on a given wafer.
Today, memories, ASICs, linear electronics and glue logic are the
preferred candidates for WLP technologies.
On the longer term, the ability to integrate
passive components into the package (especially for RF front-end
applications), will pave the way for the integration of opto-electronic
components, passive structures and MEMS in low-cost packaging.
This approach, frequently referred to as Integrated
Packaging (IP) or system-in-a-package technology, will represent
a serious alternative to SOC. IP technologies have the potential
of providing solutions to the most important challenges faced by
SOC technologies: cost, time-to-market, and legal issues.
Summary
 |
The growth of wireless communications in Europe
(Figure 4), and its demands for smaller end products with
powerful features is re-shaping and revitalizing electronics
on this continent.
Figure
4. Thermally
enhanced, cavity-down TBGA packages, shown as flex and laminate
versions.
|
While flexible substrates have been the choice for
CSPs, and near-CSPs, because of the high circuit density flex circuits
permit, the recent availability of very thin laminate substrates
has enabled the production of BGAs as thin as 0.9 mm. Due both to
its footprint and board-level reliability, the European telecom
sector is embracing this laminate-based package format.
References
1. R. Henkel, "Finland's Nokia Extends Lead
in Booming Cellular Market," Semiconductor Business News, Dec. 16,
1999.
2. BPA Group Ltd., "Technology Watch Report,"
December 1998.
3. Directive 76/769/EEC, EU second draft WEEE
(Waste for Electrical and Electronic Equipment), July 1998.
4. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors,
1999 Edition, SEMATECH.
5. H. Koyama and R. Van Tassel, The McKinsey
Quarterly, Number 3, 1998, pp. 142-153.
|
Mr.
Lerner is CEO and was the principal founder of CS2. He has more
than 15 years experience in IC subcontract assembly. Prior to
founding CS2, he occupied key management posts at several major
packaging foundries, including Amkor-Anam Euro-services and
Swire Technologies. He earned a degree in mechanical engineering
from the State University of New York, Stony Brook. Readers
may contact him at steve.lerner@cs2.be. or +32.272.00000. |
|
Dr.
Truzzi is director of engineering and technology development
at CS2. Prior to joining CS2, he was in charge of the High
Density Packaging Applications Group at IMEC, Belgium. Earlier,
he held posts at ST Microelec-tronics, Telecom Italia and
Marposs (I). He earned a degree in electrical engineering
from the University of Bologna, Italy, and a doctorate in
metrology from the Polytechnic University of Torino, Italy.
Contact Dr. Truzzi at claudio.truzzi@cs2.be.
|
 |
|