Media Kit
For advertisements and demographics
click here
 
 Current Advertisers

List of the sponsors

 Publisher's Letter
Some Thoughts about Golf
 
 Assembly Lines
Y2K Thoughts: To Look Forward, You Have to Look Back!
 
 Electronic Trends
Area Array Package I/O Pitch Will Continue to Decline
 
 Small Talk
Is Flip-Chip a Case of the Right Technology Before Its Time?
 
 Wafer - Level Watch

`One-Size-Fits-All' Thinking Must Change for Wafer Level

 
 Harvey Miller's Notebook
It's a New Market Phase for Flex-Based Semiconductor Packages
 
 On Test
Test Process Choices Influence Cost, Throughput and ATE Design
 
 Industry News
Get Higher Yields or Your Money Back!
Merger of AMT, Hana Creates $300 Million Company
People in The News
Company News
Calendar of Events
 
 Features
The Bandwagon Starts to Roll for Lead-Free Electronics
A Primer on Lead-Free Solder
Lead - Free Chip-Scale Soldering of Packages
A Period of Adjustment
An Expert Looks at the Issues™
Integrated Assembly and Strip Test of Chip-Scale Packages
Dispensing Equipment: Getting Smarter and More Automated
Are Chip-Scale Packages and Known-Good Die Competitors or Teammates?
Site Synergy and Short Cycle Times Drive Advanced Packaging in Europe
 
 Contacts
Industry Contacts
 
 Opinion
As Device Complexity Increases, Final Test Grows in Importance
 
 Patents
Patent Employs Modified TAB Technology to Produce CSPs
 
 Tools & Technologies
Dynacraft Offers Low-Cost CSP Leadframe and more
 
 Archives
2000
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec
1999
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec
1998
  Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec

  Subscription
Free U.S. Subscription Form


 
 
An Independent Journal Dedicated to the Advancement of Chip - Scale Electronics
March - April 2000

Email the editor

  Test Process Choices Influence Cost, Throughput and ATE Design

"Batch handling [of CSPs] will drive the manufacturer toward parallel test even more strongly than in the past . . ."

The introduction of chip-scale packaging in high volume requires a new mind-set when addressing the test process steps.

Because of the characteristics of the CSP manufacturing process, classic IC test requires some revision. Paying careful attention to what testing is done at which step of the process will pay large dividends in the cost of the process.

By Paul M. Sakamoto
Contributing Editor

First, let's look at an extremely simplified IC test flow. After a wafer is processed through the fab, it is typically tested to a relatively loose set of parameters at wafer sort test.

This testing will usually relax most of the AC parameters, such as frequency and propagation delay, while attempting to test most DC characteristics thoroughly.

The next test step is post-assembly package test. This test is usually the one that stresses AC parameters, as well as any functionality that was difficult to test at wafer sort.

This overly simple test flow has already lost favor in the commodity memory market, due to the fact that it doesn't maximize the package test yield.

Why is this important in the DRAM manufacturing segment, where the package cost is fairly minimal?

There are two reasons: First, DRAM makers are concerned about those few pennies wrapped-up in the failed packaged units, due to the extreme level of price/cost competition in the memory marketplace.

The second reason is that memories are tested in parallel at all levels of testing. Parallel testing requires that the yield be as high as possible, and that the speed or other performance binning be as consistent as possible to ensure efficiency.

That issue may alter the way a CSP test process is designed, especially if the devices are non-memory ICs.

CSP assembly is particularly suited to handling the devices in a strip, matrix or panel of devices.

This panel is a ready-made carrier to move multiple devices through a parallel test system-handler combination.

Batch handling will drive the manufacturer toward parallel test even more strongly than in the past, since it may be possible to move 50-100 devices in parallel.

As a result of this efficiency, the average CSP device will now have the same yield and efficiency issues that have been driving DRAM testing for some time.

Correlation

Achieving a high level of correlation from wafer sort to packaged test may require some manufacturers to add at-temperature test to their wafer sort equipment.

At-temperature testing requires wafer probers which are equipped with special "hot and cold" chucks or wafer stages.

Additionally, much greater characterization work may be needed to ensure that the relationship between fab process parameters and the final performance of the devices is well understood and guard-banded.

Probe Cards

Special high-performance probe cards may be needed to achieve full performance testing at speed and with full specs for analog signals at wafer test.

This strategy implies that the high-performance test equipment will be used at wafer sort, and that a lower cost, lower performance ATE choice may be made for final test.

In fact, the first drive to ATE that fulfills this niche has already begun.

I expect that ATE capable of 3,000 or more channels with the capability to efficiently test >64 devices per station at $10K cost/site is going to arrive within the next year.

These new machines will offer full DC and minimal AC specifications. It will be interesting to see how this affects the overall ATE marketplace.

Mr. Sakamoto is vice president of the Memory Products Division at Credence Systems Corp., Fremont, Calif. Contact him at paul_sakamoto@credence.com.

 
 
  Copyright (C) 2000