| Flip-Chip and/or CSP:
Separating the Sheep from the Goats |
|
Flip-chip and chip-scale packaging come
from very separate worlds, each with its own technological
base. As the two converge in the cauldron of wafer-level packaging,
it is becoming difficult to distinguish between them.
I am often asked whether flip-chip and
wafer-level packaging are the same. Some per-spective is helpful
in answering the question.
Flip-chip has been used interchangeably
with the IBM C4 Process (Controlled Collapse Chip Contact),
which is the high-lead solder ball used to connect the C4
chip to its substrate.
|
 |
|
By
Dr. Tom Di Stefano
Contributing Editor
|
High-lead solder was used to relieve thermal
stress and to provide a reliable contact between chip and substrate.
C4 chips were intended for use in modules with low expansion substrates
that minimize thermally generated stresses. These modules were often
hermetically sealed to protect bare chips from the environment.
Vertically integrated companies use various
flip chips in high-end computing, automotive and consumer products
specifically designed for the requirement.
Standardization is unnecessary in vertically
integrated applications where assembly, burn-in and test are engineered
for the specific product. These flip chips can in no way be considered
wafer-level packages, but rather are bare chips that are finished
into packaged ICs by the manufacturer.
IBM Yasu began a significant departure from
flip-chip orthodoxy with the introduction of underfill to improve
the reliability of flip chips attached directly to memory modules.
Underfill encapsulates the chip and protects
it from the environment. It also relieves stress by joining the
chip to its substrate forming a bi-metallic strip that can flex
in response to differential thermal expansion. Thus began a movement
to adapt flip-chip for use as an SMT component and to minimize the
quirky problems of designing for underfill.
In converging toward a package that is SMT compatible,
a range of technologies is being developed to solve problems of
solder reliability and to protect the chip against handling and
corrosion.
Posts, springs, stacked solder balls, flexible
balls, low-temperature solder, conductive organic materials and
many other approaches are being developed to provide reliable electrical
connection to the chip. Successful solutions should provide acceptable
reliability, even when assembled to a PWB without underfill.
With the MicroSMT introduced by National Semiconductor
Corp. and with ICs from Dallas Semiconductor, we are beginning to
see wafer-level packaging reach the market. On a broad front, flip
chips are being dressed up and adapted for use as wafer-level packaged
ICs.
While flip-chip-based solutions are moving toward
providing a complete SMT package, chip-scale packaging is moving
toward production at the wafer level to reduce cost.
Wafer-level production is a natural progression
to processing more and more chip-scale packages in an array. Beyond
cost reduction, chip-scale packaging is driven toward wafer-level
production by advantages in logistics, burn-in, test and IC performance.
Convergence
In this convergence of technologies, we need
a touchstone to separate the sheep from the goats.
The market expects wafer-level packaged ICs
to satisfy certain requirements, including reliability. The package
must allow assembly on a conventional SMT line without under-fill.
It must be fully tested and protected against handling damage and
corrosion. And it should meet industry-accepted standards.
|
Dr. Di Stefano is a chip-scale packaging
pioneer, a prolific author and inventor, and the founder of
Tessera. He is currently president of Decision Track, Mountain
View, Calif., and may be reached at tdistefano@decisiontrack.com.
|
|