Media Kit
For advertisements and demographics
click here
On Line Reader Service
 Publisher's Letter
We're Seeing Light at the End of the Tunnel

 Assembly Lines
Spring Cleaning Follies Reveal Decades of Forgotten, Hardly Missed Treasures

 Opto-Electronically Speaking
A Day Without Sensors? - Unimaginable!

 A View From Asia
Singapore's IC Packaging Players Hold Their Own In the Face of China's Threat

 Electronic Trends
Downturn Brings Consolidation, Unit Decline for IC Assemblers

 Standards
Pricing Pressures Continue to Challenge Profitability in NEMI's '02 A&P Roadmap

 On Test
Likely Upturn in the Second Half of the Year Will Fill Subcontractors' Capacity

 Industry News
Company News
Letter To the Editor
ICAPS 2002 Photo Album
Packaging Foundries
Opto/Nanotechnology
People in the News
Literature Review
Calendar of Events
Editorial Index

 Features
Cover Story: Packaging Foundries - As Providers Regroup for the Next Cycle, 'Convergence' Moves into the Spotlight
International Directory of IC Packaging Foundries

Cover Story: The Worldwide IC Packaging Foundry Business - How the Industry Slump Is Changing the Rules

Optoelectronics Feature: Wanted - Packaging Equipment for MEMS, MOEMS and Optoelectronic Applicationss

 Tools & Technologies
Embedded Passives Trimmer Introduced and more...

 Patents
Thin, Wafer-Level Package Is Made Without Damaging Die

 Archives
2002
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-Jun
2001
Jan-Feb March April
May-June July Aug-Sep
October Nov-Dec  
2000
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec
1999
Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec
1998
  Mar-Apr May-June
July-Aug Sept-Oct Nov-Dec


Subscription

 
Current Issue
The International Reference for Chip-Scale Electronics, Flip-Chip Technology, Optoelectronic Interconnection and Wafer-Level Packaging
May - June 2002
Letter to the Publisher

'I Was...Surprised by the APEX Comments'

Gene,

I was a little surprised by the APEX comments in your latest editorial. APEX has gone out of its way to provide our supporters, exhibitors and attendees with an experience that is better than NEPCON in every way. We have stronger educational and technical conference programs than NEPCON ever offered.

We have cut exhibitor floor space expenses in half and reduced additional service expenses, as well. We go out of our way to work with the trade publications and offer them value. Our customer service commitment is extremely strong, and we are not trying to maximize profits and take them out of the industry. I would be very interested to hear why you think APEX has become a NEPCON rerun and where you think we can improve.

Kim Sterling

IPC Vice President, Marketing & Communications

[kimsterling@mail.ipc.org]

Gene Selven replies:

It was not my intention to knock APEX in my column, but rather to give my perception to our readers that APEX 2002, like NEPCON, was not a semiconductor show. I did comment on some very positive things about the quality of visitors at your show and noted that the buzz was about technology.

Similarly, the SEMICON Europa show, from which I had just returned when I received your letter, was abuzz with new products from companies that didn't cut their R&D budgets. They announced these products at the Europa show and will make further announcements at SEMICON West in July. Recent activity, however, has convinced me that the economic upturn has begun!

With the economic upturn underway, I think every company should look at its focus to ensure that it is on the growth side of the market. After what we have gone through in this economic period, it should be a must to recalibrate who you are, what your focus is, and where your roadmap leads in the future.

Sincerely,

Gene Selven

Chip Scale Review welcomes letters from readers to the editor and/or publisher. All letters received by e-mail are assumed to be meant for publication and are subject to editing.

 
Copyright © 2002